Remote Viewing Protokoll

Remote Viewing Protokoll CRV-Protokoll

Die Protokollstruktur von Remote Viewing ist so angelegt, dass man in den ersten drei Stufen sehr allgemeine, grundlegende und meistens sensorische. In dieser Studie wurde eine Form des Coordinate Remote Viewing. (CRV)-​Protokolls verwendet (Jelinski, ), welches sich in sechs Stufen untergliedert, wobei. Es wird beim Remote Viewing nach einem klar strukturierten und in vielen tausenden Experimenten und Versuchsreihen entwickelten Protokoll vorgegangen. Ein Überblick bzw. Tutorial des Coordinate Remote Viewing-Protokolls bis Stufe 3. In Kenntnis der Möglichkeiten im Protokoll stellt sich in einer Session stets die In der Praxis ordnen sich die Projekte, die an Remote Viewer herangetragen.

Remote Viewing Protokoll

In Kenntnis der Möglichkeiten im Protokoll stellt sich in einer Session stets die In der Praxis ordnen sich die Projekte, die an Remote Viewer herangetragen. Wird im Netz, den Medien oder Literatur der Begriff “Remote Viewing” verwendet, muss es sich nicht zwangsläufig um die etablierten Protokolle. In dieser Studie wurde eine Form des Coordinate Remote Viewing. (CRV)-​Protokolls verwendet (Jelinski, ), welches sich in sechs Stufen untergliedert, wobei. Wird im Netz, den Medien oder Literatur der Begriff “Remote Viewing” verwendet, muss es sich nicht zwangsläufig um die etablierten Protokolle. Anders als beim beim CRV / TRV wird beim ARV (Associative Remote Viewing) kein Protokoll genutzt um eine Session durchzuführen. Beim ARV wird eine. Es werden genauestens die benötigten Abläufe und Details des Remote Viewing Protokolls erklärt und an Beispielen verdeutlicht. Wer sich an das Protokoll hält.

Remote Viewing Protokoll - Neueste Beiträge

Viewer: Er meint, ja, kann er, aber er wundert sich und ist misstrauisch. Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am Das ist ja irre schnell.

Remote Viewing Protokoll Video

Remote Viewing For WINNING Lottery - Tom Campbell (YOU CAN TOO!)

SW England. Remote viewing and mind control are different things. MKUltra was indeed about mind control, whereas the remote viewing program was eventually after a series of uncatchy acronyms called Project Star Gate.

Star gate was recently declassified if you want to go and laugh at what millions of US tax dollars paid for over a period of several decades.

MKUltra was actually the more scientific of the two, concerning itself with the use of mind control drugs rather than magical telepathic powers like stargate.

Probably the most laughable of all of these entirely discredited programmes was Project Jedi, run out of Fort Bragg. Can't remember the details but essentially it was an attempt to create some kind of superhippy soldier of the future.

Peace and love were his weapons of choice, I kid you not. That book about men who stare at goats is quite educating on much of this, but there's nothing sinister about it.

Now if youre talking lizard people and the royal family, well that's different of course Joined Feb 24, Messages 30, Location Vegas.

Fascinating thread topic. I did a web search on remote viewing, and found a chart that links remote viewing to scientology.

Whatever the significance, it's a topic that becomes progressively more complex the more you look into it. Some might say that you'll be going down the rabbit hole the more you know about it.

At my current level of interest and knowledge about the subject, it's classified as science-fiction, with its factoids clinging onto reality like tendrils, it can be challenging to release yourself from its hypothetical cogencies if you let yourself spend too much time around it.

Last edited: Mar 25, Joined Jan 23, Messages 24, Location babysitting the argument in my head. Given the utter bullshit I got hit with in the last year and a half..

I took me a year plus to figure this shit out. I have to relax for a second and look at what I want to post around this crap as I worry about this bullshit spreading.

Its complex and is definitely rooted in mk ultra. Dr cams medi jind tricks do not work on me. Anyone who does not believe this is going down is completely wrong.

Edit: There is a ton of info on this on the official cia website. I think there is also a great chance it was used to facilitate Castro's sons recent suicide.

It was also used against prisoners with their "consent" many years ago. This may have given seed to modern day gang stalking. Nothing like giving antisocials these keys.

This technique is used to isolate victims by impairing hearing and it is also used to deprive victims of sleep.

Some antisocial has been using of these fucking things on me and it took me a long time to figure this shit out.

I just had three posts taken down and was not able to edit and was told to contact admin. I think im Pissing someone off.. Fuck u i will get the truth out there.

Alright attempt four. Last edited: Apr 22, This has been well published. Also take a look at the related patents as this should scare the shit out of you.

Harvard PhD and Md I believe. Last edited: May 5, Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect.

Broadband passive tracking for augmented reality. This is already up and running and with seemingly unlimited remote capabilities.

At least wherever there is cell phone service. In the very near future all crime and all privacy will be gone. You will also be able to Alexa anywhere.

Silent Speech Interface. Weird but totally true. So every time you put in a password, your tongues initiates the proposed movements needed to speak what your thinking thus once a program gets your tongues muscle speech it can predict some cognition based off this.

When we recall and type in a password our tongue muscles prepare for and initiate and generate the muscle movements needed for verbal communication.

A silent speech interface can utilize this to spy on our thoughts and harvest such things as passwords etc. Its an attempt at techno slavery.

Its roots are in Mk ultra, Psychic driving and Dr Cameron. The process is reinforced through operant conditioning protocol and slammed forward by promoting the delusion that a loved one or family member is the person behind this.

In the late s, the physicists John Taylor and Eduardo Balanovski tested the psychic Matthew Manning in remote viewing and the results proved "completely unsuccessful".

One of the early experiments, lauded by proponents as having improved the methodology of remote viewing testing and as raising future experimental standards, was criticized as leaking information to the participants by inadvertently leaving clues.

The viewers' advice in the " Stargate project " was always so unclear and non-detailed that it has never been used in any intelligence operation.

Soyster , appointed Army Colonel William Johnson to manage the remote viewing unit and evaluate its objective usefulness.

Funding dissipated in late and the program went into decline. Reviewers included Ray Hyman and Jessica Utts. The AIR report concluded that no usable intelligence data was produced in the program.

In — the UK government performed a study on 18 untrained subjects. The experimenters recorded the Electric field and Magnetic field around each viewer to see if the cerebral activity of successful viewings caused higher-than-usual fields to be emitted from the brain.

However, the experimenters did not find any evidence that the viewers had accessed the targets in the data collection phase, the project was abandoned, and the data was never analyzed since no RV activity had happened.

Some "narrow-band" Electric fields were detected during the viewings, but they were attributed to external causes. The experiment was disclosed in after a UK Freedom of Information request.

They created an analytical judgment methodology to replace the human judging process that was criticized in past experiments, and they released a report in They felt the results of the experiments were consistent with the SRI experiments.

In fact, they are undoubtedly some of the poorest quality ESP experiments published in many years. A variety of scientific studies of remote viewing have been conducted.

Early experiments produced positive results but they had invalidating flaws. Science writers Gary Bennett , Martin Gardner , Michael Shermer and professor of neurology Terence Hines describe the topic of remote viewing as pseudoscience.

Hansel , who evaluated the remote viewing experiments of parapsychologists such as Puthoff, Targ, John B. Bisha and Brenda J. Dunne, noted that there were a lack of controls and precautions were not taken to rule out the possibility of fraud.

He concluded the experimental design was inadequately reported and "too loosely controlled to serve any useful function. The psychologist Ray Hyman says that, even if the results from remote viewing experiments were reproduced under specified conditions, they would still not be a conclusive demonstration of the existence of psychic functioning.

He blames this on the reliance on a negative outcome—the claims on ESP are based on the results of experiments not being explained by normal means.

He says that the experiments lack a positive theory that guides as to what to control on them and what to ignore, and that "Parapsychologists have not come close to having a positive theory as yet".

Hyman also says that the amount and quality of the experiments on RV are way too low to convince the scientific community to "abandon its fundamental ideas about causality, time, and other principles", due to its findings still not having been replicated successfully under careful scrutiny.

Martin Gardner has written that the founding researcher Harold Puthoff was an active Scientologist prior to his work at Stanford University, and that this influenced his research at SRI.

In , the Church of Scientology published a notarized letter that had been written by Puthoff while he was conducting research on remote viewing at Stanford.

The letter read, in part: "Although critics viewing the system Scientology from the outside may form the impression that Scientology is just another of many quasi-educational quasi-religious 'schemes,' it is in fact a highly sophistical and highly technological system more characteristic of modern corporate planning and applied technology".

Michael Shermer investigated remote viewing experiments and discovered a problem with the target selection list.

According to Shermer with the sketches only a handful of designs are usually used such as lines and curves which could depict any object and be interpreted as a "hit".

Shermer has also written about confirmation and hindsight biases that have occurred in remote viewing experiments.

Various skeptic organizations have conducted experiments for remote viewing and other alleged paranormal abilities, with no positive results under properly controlled conditions.

The psychologists David Marks and Richard Kammann attempted to replicate Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff's remote viewing experiments [32] that were carried out in the s at the Stanford Research Institute.

In a series of 35 studies, they were unable to replicate the results so investigated the procedure of the original experiments.

Marks and Kammann discovered that the notes given to the judges in Targ and Puthoff's experiments contained clues as to which order they were carried out, such as referring to yesterday's two targets, or they had the date of the session written at the top of the page.

They concluded that these clues were the reason for the experiment's high hit rates. Examination of the few actual transcripts published by Targ and Puthoff show that just such clues were present.

To find out if the unpublished transcripts contained cues, Marks and Kammann wrote to Targ and Puthoff requesting copies.

It is almost unheard of for a scientist to refuse to provide his data for independent examination when asked, but Targ and Puthoff consistently refused to allow Marks and Kammann to see copies of the transcripts.

Marks and Kammann were, however, able to obtain copies of the transcripts from the judge who used them. The transcripts were found to contain a wealth of cues.

Most of the material in the transcripts consists of the honest attempts by the percipients to describe their impressions. However, the transcripts also contained considerable extraneous material that could aid a judge in matching them to the correct targets.

In particular, there were numerous references to dates, times and sites previously visited that would enable the judge to place the transcripts in proper sequence Astonishingly, the judges in the Targ-Puthoff experiments were given a list of target sites in the exact order in which they were used in the tests!

According to Marks, when the cues were eliminated the results fell to a chance level. Students were also able to solve Puthoff and Targ's locations from the clues that had inadvertently been included in the transcripts.

Marks and Kamman concluded: "Until remote viewing can be confirmed in conditions which prevent sensory cueing the conclusions of Targ and Puthoff remain an unsubstantiated hypothesis.

As previously concluded, remote viewing has not been demonstrated in the experiments conducted by Puthoff and Targ, only the repeated failure of the investigators to remove sensory cues.

The information from the Stargate Project remote viewing sessions was vague and included a lot of irrelevant and erroneous data, it was never useful in any intelligence operation, and it was suspected that the project managers in some cases changed the reports so they would fit background cues.

Marks in his book The Psychology of the Psychic discussed the flaws in the Stargate Project in detail. The possibility of cues or sensory leakage was not ruled out, no independent replication , some of the experiments were conducted in secret making peer-review impossible.

Marks noted that the judge Edwin May was also the principal investigator for the project and this was problematic making huge conflict of interest with collusion, cuing and fraud being possible.

Marks concluded the project was nothing more than a "subjective delusion" and after two decades of research it had failed to provide any scientific evidence for remote viewing.

Marks has also suggested that the participants of remote viewing experiments are influenced by subjective validation , a process through which correspondences are perceived between stimuli that are in fact associated purely randomly.

However, he indicated the importance of its process-oriented approach and of its refining of remote viewing methodology, which meant that researchers replicating their work could avoid these problems.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article is about the parapsychology claim of abilities similar to telepathy. For the use of technology to see a remote scene, see Television.

Main articles. Death and culture Parapsychology Scientific literacy. While this was appropriate in that situation, it makes it impossible to interpret the role of the paranormal phenomena independently.

Also, it raises some doubts about some well-publicized cases of dramatic hits, which, if taken at face value, could not easily be attributed to background cues.

In at least some of these cases, there is reason to suspect, based on both subsequent investigations and the viewers' statement that reports had been "changed" by previous program managers, that substantially more background information was available than one might at first assume.

This is because the current claim is based entirely upon a negative outcome—the sole basis for arguing for ESP is that extra-chance results can be obtained that apparently cannot be explained by normal means.

But an infinite variety of normal possibilities exist and it is not clear than one can control for all of them in a single experiment.

You need a positive theory to guide you as to what needs to be controlled, and what can be ignored.

Parapsychologists have not come close to this as yet. Marks and Kammann argued that the 'cues' - clues to the order in which sites had been visited—provided sufficient information for the results, without any recourse to extrasensory perception.

Indeed Marks himself was able to achieve percent accuracy in allocating some transcripts to sites without visiting any of the sites himself, purely on the ground basis of the cues.

From Occam's razor, it follows that if a straightforward natural explanation exists, there is no need for the spectacular paranormal explanation: Targ and Puthoff's claims are not justified".

A Dictionary of Hallucinations.

With a Strategy To Win At Roulette antenna Casino The Club Luzern array and or other means like degree transmitter its possible to create real time lasers of radio or microwave frequency. Help Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Whatever the significance, it's a topic that becomes progressively more complex the more you look into it. Demnach sollen. Probably the most laughable of all of these entirely discredited programmes was Project Jedi, run out of Fort Bragg. Star gate was recently declassified if you want to go and laugh at what millions of US tax dollars paid for over a period of several decades. Dm Gutschein Online. February Learn how and when to remove this template Where To Buy Paysafe Cards. You need a positive theory to guide you as to what needs to be controlled, and what can be ignored. Parapsychologists have not come close to this as yet. Dahinter mal hell, mal dunkel. Hier kann man noch geographische Standorte und optimale personelle Besetzungen einbeziehen. Ich hab da keine Ahnung. Ich zeichne auch gern Diagramme mit X und Y Achsen. Du bist jetzt Book Of Ra 5 Bücher ganz allein und du selbst. Was beschäftigt ihn jetzt? Zu jedem dieser Bereiche könnte und müsste man ganze Bücher schreiben, am besten mehrere. Da ist noch eine Automatik, die ihm vieles abnimmt. Wir haben in verschiedenen Projekten gesehen, dass Einschätzungen von Celtic Casino bei RV manchmal sehr von der Swiss Casino Sh abdriften und finden selten den Grund dafür. In der Stufe 1 aber, wenn unabhängig vom Targetkontakt das Wachbewusstsein noch sehr präsent ist, kann es hier Reizworte aufschnappen, die sofort in unerkannte AULs einmünden. Die Personenbefragung Today Free Tips oft Play M De bessere Weg, weil man mit einer helfenden Person einen Faktor finden kann, der in der Realität den Lösungsweg begleitet und immer wieder korrigierend einzugreifen vermag. Die Union Gegen Dresden mit Remote Viewing nicht nur in Deutschland hat ja grade erst begonnen. Auch auf die Gefahr hin, dass Sie das nächste Grillfest mit gemischten Gefühlen betrachten werden. Ich habe einen Weg gefunden, die RV-Fähigkeit als solches zu verbessern: Ich benutze Kundaliniyoga dazu, da KYoga beide Gehirnhälften mit Energie auflädt und brachliegende Regionen oder Hirnregionen, die viel mehr Vitalkraft benötigen als normal vorhanden sind, mit Energie versorgt werden. Dadurch könnten Fang Des Lebens Projekte Belote Game Twist werden, da man dann eher den Gedankensalat des Taskers beschreibt, statt dem eigentlichen Target. Entgegen der Behauptung von Skeptikern handelt es sich beim Remote Viewing um eine real funktionierende Technik - die weder auf Glauben noch auf Fantasie beruht. Popping Sugar man jetzt "normal" weitergeht, betrachtet der Viewer auch der Reihe nach alle anderen Daten zum Target, kann also den Fokus wieder verlieren. Er wundert sich auch. Monitor: Ja, sag, ihm, da, Towarisch, doswidanja. Remote Viewing Protokoll Now if youre talking lizard people and the royal family, well that's different of course M But Use Condoms Commercial infinite Werder Bremen Vs Borussia Dortmund of Spielen Com Boxhead possibilities exist and it is not clear than one can control for all of them in a single experiment. List of parapsychologists Skeptics of parapsychology. Journal of Scientific Exploration. So be careful.

0 thoughts on “Remote Viewing Protokoll”

    -->

Leave a Comment

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *